In light of the recent claims in Louise Patten’s new book, Good as Gold , which we posted about earlier this week, we are very pleased to welcome Tim Maltin, author of 101 Things You Thought You Knew About the Titanic…But Didn’t, as guest blogger, to provide his perspective regarding the legendary and apparently, often mythical, ship.
Titanic Myths
The sinking of the Titanic is one of the best documented disasters in history. In 1912, this catastrophe was the subject of detailed public enquiries on both sides of the Atlantic. During these full hearings, more than 50,000 questions were asked of more than 100 eye-witnesses. All of their answers were recorded, in full, and published generally, as well as kept in libraries up and down the country. And yet what most of us knows about the sinking of the Titanic today is a far cry from what actually happened that night, when 1,500 people froze to death in the North Atlantic.
This is because only a few hardy souls like myself have taken the time to read all of these transcripts. Instead, most people rely for their information on the quicker fixes of newspaper reports and films. The problem here is that both of these media are more concerned with telling a good story than with telling the real story. As a result, almost everything most of us knows about Titanic today is fictional, to the extent that more myths persist about Titanic than truths.
We saw only this week a great example of how quickly the media can create new myths about the Titanic, which become immediately part of our collective consciousness, thus distorting our impressions of the real event. On Wednesday Lady Patten revealed that her grandfather, 2nd Officer Lightoller, who was the most senior surviving officer of the tragedy had confided in Lady Patten’s grandmother a secret that he had never publicly revealed.
This was – according to Lady Patten – that Titanic‘s accident had been largely caused by Quartermaster Hitchens, at Titanic’s wheel, “panicking” and turning to starboard when 1st Officer Murdoch, in charge of the bridge at the time, gave him the order “hard-a-Starboard”!
This story has been gobbled up by a media constantly hungry for Titanic stories…diagrams by science correspondents have even been used to back up Lady Patten’s claims to the effect that Hitchens was trained in rudder orders, whereas the more senior officers were used to giving tiller orders!
Given that most newspaper readers do not know their ports from their starboards, all of this amounts to an intoxicating level of detail…with the perfect provenance of having been handed down from the most senior man who was there at the time.
Thus it passes into Titanic lore and unknowledgeable fathers will tell their children who will do homework projects on the Titanic about this steering error. In fact, only a little knowledge of nautical matters, combined with more detailed knowledge of what actually happened that night, quickly reveals that – despite Lady Patten’s best intentions – her story is utter rubbish, because:
- Ships wheels have always been turned in the direction you wish to turn, like an automobile. This has not changed from the Cutty Sark to today.
- Although Titanic was an American-owned ship, her crew was entirely British, where helm orders were always given in reverse until after WW1 – more than 5 years after Titanic sank – when they were standardised to be the same as the American non-reversed helm orders used today.
- Had Hitchen’s, an experienced Quartermaster, nevertheless made this unaccountable mistake, 6th Officer Moody, standing at his side in the wheelhouse, would undoubtedly have spotted such a basic error immediately, when he confirmed to 1st Officer Murdoch “The wheel is hard over, Sir!”
- We know from 4th Officer Boxhall and Quartermaster Olliver, both of whom got up and walked to the bridge immediately they heard the three bells from the crowsnest warning of an object straight ahead, that between warning and collision was approximately 38 seconds.
- Had it been the 4 minutes Patten claims, Titanic would easily have had time to correct any error…but would not have needed to, as turning either to port or to starboard would have avoided the iceberg at that distance (1.5 miles).
Lady Patten goes on to assert that Titanic sank more rapidly because Titanic‘s owner Bruce Ismay ordered that the ship should carry on steaming after the accident. Similarly, even a cursory look at the Enquiries reveals that Ismay did not arrive on Titanic‘s bridge (direct from his bedroom) until well after Titanic‘s engines had been stopped for the last time.
And so another myth – recently born – is easily extinguished. I have done this for all the myths about the Titanic, so that everyone who is interested may learn the facts from the many fictions. My book is called 101 Things You Thought You Knew About The Titanic…But Didn’t . I unashamedly commend you to read it, as the truth of what happened the incredible night the Titanic sank is much stranger than any fiction.
Tim Maltin
Thank you Mr. Maltin for both your book and the above explanation. The Lady Patten who served in Westminster being as a result fully trained in ‘spin’ also known as BS got more than a little carried away.
Good Watch.
I agree that the steering issue that she made “new evidence,” was rubbish, however some of the other things she stated where already covered in my book that came out 2 months ago… so none of what she has said in her interview is really new information, the media need to start doing more research before just taking the words of one person… the Press release for my books and an article are as follows:
http://prlog.org/10833959
http://prlog.org/10949458
Pingback: GreenfieldWeblog.com blog about daily life | Daily Articles and News, Articole si Stiri Zilnice GreenfieldWeblog.com Autumn Edition
Lady Patten did not ‘serve at Westminster’ [that was husband Lord (John) Patten]: she is a successful businesswoman and FTSE company director. See, e.g.: http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/movers_and_shakers/article4075890.ece
However all she has given us is uncorroborated hearsay of conversations 50 years ago, so I defer to Tim Maltby’s expertise in this matter & accept his rebuttal, which will not, I fear, do much to kill the story off.
Indeed Chris Squire one stands corrected, the ‘at’ was not needed ‘served Westminster’ suffices. The Lady Patten is known as “queen of the non-executives” to quote ‘The Sunday Times’. She was a non-executive director of Bradford and Bingley when HM Government had to step in and nationalise the mortgage lender. She was asked to stay on at B & B but was critisied for her role in the banks failure. Successful businesswoman one might say is relative to capability at ‘spin’ – which capability is undoubted.
Good Watch.
It is good to hear someone correct this sad red herring. Those of us who have studied the stories of Titanic knew right away this was false. At the time turning the wheel to starboard was done to get the oppostie direction. The Iceberg was just too close then again. When the following order to hard to starboard was given full speed astern the ship was doomed. Full speed astern took precious seconds. It temporarily took the thrust of the propellers against the rudder away. The main propeller behind the rudder did not reverse. The twin propellers on either side did reverse but they were not directly behind the rudder. As the lookouts testified they thought the ship was going to hit the berg and at the last moments the ship began to move to port. To the left for you who do not sail. The result was the starboard side of the ship from just behind the bow to just under the bridge was damaged by the iceberg. 5 compartments flooded in the first 10 minutes. One more than the ship was designed to be able to survive. All they could do now was run the pumps to gain time and evacutate the ship.
Just watched National Geographic Channel “Titanic Case Closed” with Tim Maltin he said that the SS Californian didn’t see Titanic because of the cold water mirage but the crew knew there was a ship on the horizon saw the rockets and flickering morse lights. Why would you not go and turn on the radio. Why would Captain Lord when finding out that the Titanic sank sail a direct route to the position rather than going the long way around. At the inquiry where was the scap log book. He seemed to be a man hiding answers. This wouldn’t of saved the Titanic but maybe more people would of been saved. http://www.titanicology.com/California/Navigational_Incosistencies.pdf
by Samuel Halpern.
Have seen the documentary and read the two books by Tim Matlin and he has done a great thorough investigation to get past the myths of the Titanic. It is clear that a lot of confusion existed that fatal night and his books show the simple truth: Titanic was hit at the water line by an iceberg, one of a ring or field of bergs and she is doomed. The ship takes on more water than she can deal with flooding engine room 5 and 6 as she steams on and then stops, both risky. A series of errors makes the accident worse, there are not enough life boats and women and children are given priority in the 16 on board. C H Lightoller may have been responsible for only allowing women and children to board, but he was also responsible for saving their lives. He was held up as a hero, although he may have made errors in both his testimony and his actions, but he essentially did nothing wrong and could not have prevented the ship going to her watery grave. Just because there may be holes in his testimony does not mean that he was part of some half baked conspiracy. He resented the questions as he believed he had done his duty and his best to save lives. These so called relatives should be proud of their grand father not trying to blacken his name, especially when they do not have one single piece of solid evidence, just the gossip of a batty aunt, jealous of her brother and his life.
Tim Maltin appears to be launching a myth of his own: the RMS Titanic was an entirely British ship, owned and operated by a British company – White Star Line – and crewed by British seamen. The only Americans involved were those unfortunates amongst her passengers.
Paul Norman should check his facts – he’s right that Titanic was British, she was registered in Liverpool but In 1902 White Star Line was absorbed into the International Mercantile Marine Co. (IMM), a large American shipping conglomerate. Bruce Ismay ceded control to IMM in the face of intense pressure from shareholders and J. P. Morgan, who threatened a rate war. IMM was dissolved in 1932.
For a breakdown of losses by Nationality, see this site: http://www.icyousee.org/titanic.html