New Biography of Joshua Slocum by Geoffrey Wolff

The Boston Globe has an interesting interview with Geoffrey Wolff, who has written a new biography of Joshua Slocum, The Hard Way Around: The Passages of Joshua Slocum. The book also got a rave review by Nathaniel Phibrick in the New York Times Sunday Book Section.

While the biography sounds intiguing, reading the interview made me want to go back to reread Slocum’s classic Sailing Alone Around the World. Joshua Slocum was the first person to sail around the world alone in1897  in his 37-foot sloop, the Spray.  He wrote Sailing Alone Around the World, a masterpiece of nautical literature, in 1900 on the return from his epic voyage.

From the Boston Globe interview:

Wolff’s nonfiction works include “The Duke of Deception’’ and biographies of Harry Crosby and John O’Hara. He is also the author of six novels. Wolff spoke from his home in Bath, Maine.

Q. Where does Slocum fit in the rank of mariners such as Shackleton and Bartlett?

A. I think Joshua Slocum was the greatest sailor in modern history, chiefly because he followed his path with so little fuss, and because he was such a bravura and accurate navigator. After 5,000 miles at sea, 43 days out of sight of land, he hit the Marquesas within 5 miles. In 1896 this was extraordinary, particularly since he was a lunar navigator, a method rewarding in accuracy but incredibly painstaking. Usually it required three people to establish a fix, but he did it alone. In “Sailing Alone Around the World’’ there’s a moment of epiphany, when Slocum had been beaten back through the Strait of Magellan, then beaten back around Cape Horn, then survived the rock-strewn Milky Way at night, then battered by foul tides and contrary wind as he inched forward toward the Pacific. He was in a fair contest, a game, really, with nature. The sea he saw as a worthy opponent rather than an enemy. He also seemed to ask, “What’s the hurry?’’ That too made him different. So many of the great sailors were sailing against deadlines or speed records. That wasn’t Slocum’s spirit. In the wildness of Tierra del Fuego he became a sea creature.

One side note, for those who care about such things, relates to Slocum’s use of “lunars,” which is to say the calculation of longitude by  “lunar distances.”   How frequently Slocum actually used lunars is the subject of some discussion.   Here is one viewpoint:  Joshua Slocum’s navigational methods

There is no doubt that Slocum used lunars on one afternoon in the Pacific. And there is no doubt that he wrote an eloquent epitaph for the old lunar distance method. But the idea that Slocum completed his circumnavigation *because* he used lunars, or that he must have used lunars extensively *because* he had no chronometer is, in fact, mistaken. Slocum kept his longitude by dead reckoning and says so rather clearly, I think, in his book. His single lunar observation one afternoon in the Pacific was not so different from a modern navigator’s use of lunars –something done for fun, challenge, historical experience, but not an essential component of navigation today.

For those who haven’t read it, Sailing Alone Around the World is available free online in Kindle format which is readable on the free Kindle reader on PC, Mac, Android, and iPhone and iPad.   It is available free online in most other formats here.

Comments

New Biography of Joshua Slocum by Geoffrey Wolff — 2 Comments

  1. Ahoy there!

    I see you’ve quoted me regarding Joshua Slocum and lunars. As I noted in that post five years ago on “NavList” (which is, by the way, the best place for traditional navigation discussions on the Internet: http://www.fer3.com/NavList), it’s a mistake to think that Slocum navigated by lunars primarily or even frequently, as Geoffrey Wolff apparently does from interviews he has given regarding his new book. Primary source evidence proves this viewpoint incorrect. In fact, when Joshua Slocum was in New Zealand, he told a local newspaper reporter that he had had the opportunity to use lunars only once up until that point. That was more than halfway through the voyage. Later in the Indian Ocean, writing a letter home to his editor in New York, he again noted that he found his longitude by dead reckoning and had only shot a lunar that one time which he later wrote up so eloquently in “Sailing Alone Around the World”. Lunars by the 1890s were dead and buried. Only a handful of enthusiasts still practiced them. The era when lunars were in practical use at sea ran from about 1767 (when the Nautical Almanac first came out) to roughly 1820 on British vessels and from about 1790 to about 1850 on American vessels.

    I should add that the letter Slocum sent home from the Indian Ocean specifically stating he had only shot one lunar was either three-quarters of two-thirds of the way through the voyage depending on how you count it, by distance or days, so it’s just possible that Slocum used lunars again in the Indian Ocean or perhaps in the South Atlantic. The key point here is that the “traditional” navigation practiced by Joshua Slocum was the usual fare from the 19th century: Noon Sun for latitude and dead reckoning for longitude. It’ll get you there, especially if you can pick the days and seasons when you sail.

    I myself have shot hundreds of lunar distance sights and worked them by modern and historical methods. I’ve also analyzed lunar observations in dozens of logbooks from the first half of the 19th century, the period when they were really necessary. Their reputation as something exceedingly difficult is way off. Shooting accurate lunars requires a well-calibrated sextant and just a little practice. The math is no more difficult than the common “time sight” which was known to every 19th century celestial navigator (not more difficult but about three times longer, so more tedious definitely). I’m always happy to discuss lunars, and I also teach classes in 19th century navigation methods, as well as more modern celestial navigation.

    Frank Reed
    Mystic, CT / Chicago, IL

    PS: Your blog links to an old, unofficial archive for NavList at irbs.com. Here is a link to the same message in the current, official archive:
    http://www.fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=023288

  2. Thanks for the very interesting comment. I have updated the NavList link as well as adding NavList to our blogroll.