WWI Anti-Submarine Warfare with Seagulls, Sacks and Hammers

Anti-submarine warriors?

One of the great things about writing historical fiction is discovering odd sets of facts, often buried in the archives, that capture both the desperation and the madness of a given time. Often, as the cliche goes, you just can’t make this stuff up. Here is an account of how the Royal Navy attempted to fight back against German submarines in World War I using trained seagulls and hammers. The schemes worked about as well as one might expect. An updated repost.

For most of World War I, the Royal Navy had nothing to counter the threat of the German U-boats. The British had imposed a total naval blockade of German ports in an attempt to starve them out of the war. The Germans had responded in kind by mounting unrestricted submarine warfare targeting the merchant shipping providing Britain with essential food and supplies. Whichever country’s blockade could starve the enemy first could win the war,

The problem was that the British lacked the tools and technology to fight the German submarines. On the surface, submarines were difficult to spot as they ride low in the water, Once submerged, they were almost invisible.  The only thing that could give them away was the slender periscope protruding above the surface, which was difficult to spot at any distance,

Hydrophones were primitive and largely ineffective. ASDIC, later known as sonar, wouldn’t be developed until after the end of the war. Depth charges, which proved to be an effective weapon, weren’t available until 1916 and still required knowing where the submarine was, which remained, too often, a mystery.

Admiral Sir Frederick Samuel Inglefield had an idea; several ideas actually, which were brilliantly innovative is not necessarily practical. Inglefield had had a long and distinguished career in the Royal Navy, serving in various posts including as Fourth Sea Lord, By the time World War I had broken out, he was sidelined as commander of auxiliary patrol forces.

One of the admiral’s ideas was to use seagulls to identify German submarines operating at periscope depth. Supported by the British Board of Invention and Research, the idea was to feed wild seagulls from dummy periscopes, so the birds would associate periscopes as a place to feed. Thus, the sight of these birds flocking around the periscopes of the enemy would let the British Navy know a U-boat was in the vicinity. It was an interesting idea but the gulls turned out to be more interested in eating the fish than in being trained to fly around periscopes.

Admiral Inglefield took the idea one step further. In addition to identifying the location of the submarine, if the gulls could be trained to defecate on the periscope, the submarine would be blinded.  It was never clear how gulls could be trained to poop specifically on periscopes. Nevertheless, a gull training facility was built in Poole Harbour, but the idea was still in development when the arrival of US destroyers in 1917 made it superfluous, 

A second, more direct approach to attacking subs involved canvas sacks and hammers. Because it involved British sailors, who are much easier to train than seagulls, it appeared slightly more likely to succeed.

Admiral Inglefield was in command of a small armada of patrol craft. He proposed equipping each with a canvas sack and a large hammer. If a submarine’s periscope was spotted the launch would approach the periscope. One sailor would put the sack over the periscope while another sailor would attempt to break the periscope lens with the hammer. Not surprisingly, the approach was never tested in combat.

There were also proposals to use trained sea lions to locate submarines and also to dump large quantities of bicarbonate of soda, which would notionally cause the submarine to float to the, in contravention of Archimedes Law. 

Suffice it to say that while trained seagulls, sea lions, sacks and hammers may have shown imagination, they were not practical techniques of fighting U-boats.  The U-boat onslaught continued, until by 1917, German submarines had sunk roughly one-third of the world’s merchant fleet. 

The arrival of US destroyers in 1917, less than a month after the United States declared war on Germany, coincided with the British initiating merchant ship convoys. The convoy system finally mitigated the damage done by unrestricted submarine warfare. The U-boat threat didn’t vanish, but it became manageable.

Comments

WWI Anti-Submarine Warfare with Seagulls, Sacks and Hammers — 4 Comments

  1. Sweden was worried about Russian sub infiltration in the early 1980s when sonar picked up loud sound and on investigation, only small bubbles were found on the surface above the target. It was predominant for 15 yeras and it nearly caused a diplomatic incident until the Swedes discovered that Baltic Herring had a swim bladder connected to their anus which they would empty to dive as a shoal when itimmidated.

    It was effectively fish farting that brought a major incident close to conflict.

  2. The American designed V&W class destroyers that arrived in 1917 were game changers, some were built in British yards.

    After WW1, they were mostly laid up, a lot of them in Port Edgar near Edinburgh but they were remobilised in WW2 with great effect. Some were modiified by removing a boiler and replacing it with a fuel tank making it a very effective long range escort for Atlantic and Afriican convoys.

    My father served on HMS Vesper which was involved in extracting the Dutch Royal Family, and on Atlantic and African convoys. It carried a depth charge that was so powerful she had to launch it at 30kts (38mph) or she would have broken her own back.

  3. During tensions between Sweden and Russia during the 80s following a Russian sub running aground on Swedish rocks a huge surveillance exercise ensued. Frequently, a sonar target would be investigated as a suspected Russian sub but all that was found on the target site were small bubbles. The Swedes thought that they were evasion tactics. On many occasions it came close to diplomatic incidents. For 15 years the Swedes followed target after frustrating target until an offhand remark by a fisherman gave the solution. The Baltic herring have a swim bladder connected to their anus and in an emergency shoal dive the air from the swimbladder was evacuated causing the sonar “target.” Essentially, they were chasing fish farts!

  4. One primitive weapon against U-boats that I’m told actually worked was charmingly simple: a few meters of chain. The idea was for a boarding party to arrive aboard the U-boat as its crew was either about to embark or had just returned below. The boarding party was to drop the chain down the open hatch. Since it is notoriously difficult to push chain, the ploy kept the hatch open, making diving impractical. Unable either to fight or submerge, the U-boat then presumably surrenderedI don’t know if this ploy was ever used in combat, but I believe it seemed sufficiently plausible that some ships waging anti-submarine warfare were kitted out with chain of an appropriate length and weight.